SynthesisPsychological medicine2026
Extreme heat and mental health: systematic review and qualitative investigation of risk and protective factors.
Synthesis in Psychological medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundExtreme hot weather poses increasing risks to mental health. Yet, factors affecting vulnerability are under-researched. This mixed-method study integrates a systematic review and qualitative investigation to identify risk and protective factors for heat-related mental health issues, leading to the co-development of a screening tool. This could inform future research and, pending validation in clinical settings, support mental health professionals in assessing vulnerability among service users.
methodsWe searched PubMed and Web of Science for publications on extreme heat, mental health, and risk/protective factors. In addition, we conducted six focus groups with 21 people with lived experience of heat and/or mental illness and 12 healthcare professionals. Transcripts were analyzed using thematic content analysis and informed the co-development of the screening tool.
resultsOut of 764 articles identified by the systematic review, 47 were included. Evidence emerged for age, sex, existing mental illness, ethnicity, and socioeconomic status as risk factors. However, findings were inconsistent between studies, likely due to differences in study population and methodology. Protective effects included good physical health, social support, and exposure to green spaces. Our qualitative investigation identified additional risk and protective factors related to: (1) behavioral adaptability, (2) personal heat sensitivity, and (3) disparities in heat exposure. The resulting screening tool, HEAT-MH (Heat Exposure Assessment Tool for Mental Health), contains 15 questions on previous experiences of heat, general health, and lifestyle.
conclusionsThe mental health impacts of extreme heat depend on a range of risk and protective factors, including demographic, socioeconomic, health, and lifestyle characteristics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.