Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42411106›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of experimental biology2026

Heuristic rules for cooperative transport in wood ant nest maintenance.

Natalie Arscott, Cornelia Buehlmann, Andrew Philippides, Paul Graham

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of experimental biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Natalie ArscottSchool of Life Sciences/School of Engineering and Informatics, University of Sussex, Brighton, BN1 9QG, UK.
Cornelia BuehlmannSchool of Life Sciences/School of Engineering and Informatics, University of Sussex, Brighton, BN1 9QG, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-6628-6900
Andrew PhilippidesSchool of Life Sciences/School of Engineering and Informatics, University of Sussex, Brighton, BN1 9QG, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-5503-0467
Paul GrahamSchool of Life Sciences/School of Engineering and Informatics, University of Sussex, Brighton, BN1 9QG, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-3745-0940

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/R005036/1Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council EP/S030964/1University of Sussex
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Collective behaviour in ants includes cooperative transport where individuals control behaviour relative to an object. Some species show efficient collective food transport because individuals share directional information. It is less clear how individuals coordinate in tasks, such as movement of nest material, where movement direction is unclear. Wood ants build nests from twigs and leaf litter that require constant maintenance. We provoked such maintenance by placing sticks over nest entrances which ants removed by walking backwards aligned to the stick. When ants cooperated, the second ant joined a moving stick more quickly and precisely than initial ants. Cooperation was further promoted by ants staying engaged for longer and making fewer grip adjustments when cooperation was effective. Although coordination was stochastic and imprecise, ants respond to local sensory feedback, with adjustments that promote cooperation. This suggests collective transport can emerge from simple and flexible sensorimotor heuristics.

Indexed as

AntsCooperative BehaviorNesting BehaviorAnimalsCollaborative transportCollective behaviourCollective constructionSelf-organisationWood ants

Identifiers

PMID42411106
PMCPMC13450893

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.