ReviewThe Journal of physiology2026
Brain sparing in fetal growth restriction: The double-edged sword of fetal hypoxaemia.
Review in The Journal of physiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Quantitative assessment of brain sparing effect in fetal growth restriction: structural evidence from fetal MRI.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Fetal hypoxaemia during pregnancy is not uncommon, arising from chronic placental insufficiency or acute stressors. In the case of placental insufficiency and chronic fetal hypoxia, fetal growth is reduced, resulting in fetal growth restriction (FGR). Fetal hypoxaemia initiates an immediate adaptive strategy to preserve brain oxygen delivery - the brain sparing response. Asymmetric FGR, in which head size is relatively larger than body size, is evidence of prolonged brain sparing. The acute physiology of the brain sparing response is well-defined in preclinical studies, involving peripheral vasoconstriction and reduced cerebral resistance to promote cerebral vasodilatation. Yet, the mechanisms that maintain fetal brain sparing during sustained hypoxaemia remain incompletely understood. Furthermore, although brain sparing has historically been interpreted as protective, this concept is being challenged, with its presence linked to increased risk of death or neonatal morbidity and neuropathology. This contradiction reflects that brain sparing is not static but evolves with the severity of fetal hypoxaemia; clinical evidence points to a front-to-back pattern of brain vasodilatation that initially prioritises cortical perfusion for higher-order function, whereas prolonged or severe hypoxaemia drives a shift towards brainstem preservation and survival. Thus, the brain sparing response is initiated by fetal hypoxaemia and is a unique indicator of fetal compromise, but it progresses from a compensatory to a maladaptive response. The mechanisms, multisystem physiology and ontogeny of sustained brain sparing in severe FGR are not well characterised, but advancing this knowledge affords new opportunities to diagnose and manage FGR, and to intervene to prevent adverse consequences.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.