Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42410999›Full record

ReviewThe Journal of physiology2026

Brain sparing in fetal growth restriction: The double-edged sword of fetal hypoxaemia.

Beth J Allison, Tegan A White, Emily J Camm, Suzanne L Miller

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The Journal of physiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Beth J AllisonThe Ritchie Centre, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1060-513X
Tegan A WhiteThe Ritchie Centre, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8809-3448
Emily J CammThe Ritchie Centre, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0767-2697
Suzanne L MillerThe Ritchie Centre, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0451-8304

Funding

Inner Wheel AustraliaNational Health and Medical Research Council 2016688
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Fetal hypoxaemia during pregnancy is not uncommon, arising from chronic placental insufficiency or acute stressors. In the case of placental insufficiency and chronic fetal hypoxia, fetal growth is reduced, resulting in fetal growth restriction (FGR). Fetal hypoxaemia initiates an immediate adaptive strategy to preserve brain oxygen delivery - the brain sparing response. Asymmetric FGR, in which head size is relatively larger than body size, is evidence of prolonged brain sparing. The acute physiology of the brain sparing response is well-defined in preclinical studies, involving peripheral vasoconstriction and reduced cerebral resistance to promote cerebral vasodilatation. Yet, the mechanisms that maintain fetal brain sparing during sustained hypoxaemia remain incompletely understood. Furthermore, although brain sparing has historically been interpreted as protective, this concept is being challenged, with its presence linked to increased risk of death or neonatal morbidity and neuropathology. This contradiction reflects that brain sparing is not static but evolves with the severity of fetal hypoxaemia; clinical evidence points to a front-to-back pattern of brain vasodilatation that initially prioritises cortical perfusion for higher-order function, whereas prolonged or severe hypoxaemia drives a shift towards brainstem preservation and survival. Thus, the brain sparing response is initiated by fetal hypoxaemia and is a unique indicator of fetal compromise, but it progresses from a compensatory to a maladaptive response. The mechanisms, multisystem physiology and ontogeny of sustained brain sparing in severe FGR are not well characterised, but advancing this knowledge affords new opportunities to diagnose and manage FGR, and to intervene to prevent adverse consequences.

Indexed as

BrainFetal Growth RetardationFetal HypoxiaAnimalsFemaleHumansPregnancybrain sparingcardiovascularfetal growth restrictionhypoxianeuropathologysmall for gestational age

Identifiers

PMID42410999
PMCPMC13423135

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.