ArticlePlant biology (Stuttgart, Germany)2026
Microbial volatile compounds enhance drought resilience and productivity in CAM and C3 crops.
Article in Plant biology (Stuttgart, Germany), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Plants interact with their associated microbiota through diverse chemical cues, including microbial volatile organic compounds (mVOCs) that act as airborne signals that modulate plant physiology and stress resilience. This is particularly relevant under drought, a major constraint on global plant productivity. Although short-term physiological responses to microbial volatiles have been widely documented, their longer-term effects on functional plant traits and performance remain poorly understood, especially in species with contrasting photosynthetic strategies and water-use characteristics. We investigated the effects of selected mVOCs-camphene (CAMP), ethyl isovalerate (EV), their combination (EV + CAMP), and nonanal-in Agave tequilana and Solanum lycopersicum cv. Micro-Tom (tomato), representing CAM and C3 species, respectively. Agave and tomato seedlings were exposed once to volatiles and then grown for eight and four and a half months, respectively, under defined water-limiting regimes. In Agave, we evaluated four groups of traits: leaf and biomass, roots, pigments and sugars and proline; whereas in tomato, we assessed growth and yield. EV followed by CAMP enhanced A. tequilana performance under moderate and severe water limitation, promoting leaf and root development, increased relative water content, as well as higher carbohydrates and chlorophyll levels. In tomato, volatile exposure increased fruit yield from 0.10 to 2.65-fold under both well-watered and moderate drought, with EV exerting the strongest effect under moderate drought. Nonanal yielded net negative effects on agaves, while the mix EV + CAMP showed positive effects on tomato, but poor results on A. tequilana. Our results demonstrate that EV and CAMP, alone or in combination, act as biologically active airborne signals that modulate plant physiological plasticity under water limitation. Remarkably, a single volatile exposure produced lasting effects on vegetative and reproductive development, highlighting their potential as sustainable tools to enhance drought resilience and crop productivity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.