Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42410922›Full record

ArticleJournal of applied clinical medical physics2026

Feasibility study: Use of an optical scanning system to obtain 3D body surface images suitable for total skin electron therapy treatment dosimetry.

Scott B Crowe, Naasiha Cassim, Jenna Luscombe, Katie L McMahon, Tanya Kairn

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of applied clinical medical physics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Scott B CroweCancer Care Services, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Brisbane, Australia.
Naasiha CassimCancer Care Services, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Brisbane, Australia.
Jenna LuscombeCancer Care Services, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Brisbane, Australia.
Katie L McMahonHerston Imaging Research Facility, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Brisbane, Australia.
Tanya KairnCancer Care Services, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Brisbane, Australia.

Funding

Australian Cancer Research FoundationAustralian Centre of Excellence in Melanoma Imaging and Diagnosis
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTotal skin electron therapy (TSET, also known as TSE, TSI, TSEI or TSEBT) provides an effective treatment for extensive superficial lesions such as mycosis fungoides, although the standing setups and large distances used for treatment mean that comprehensive three-dimensional (3D) dose calculations are rarely achievable clinically. PURPOSE: This study investigated the use of photogrammetry and Monte Carlo simulations as a proposed method to verify TSET treatment dose.

methodsTrueBeam 6 MeV electron beam phase-space (PHSP) data supplied by Varian Medical Systems was validated for use in TSET treatment calculations via comparisons with existing TSET commissioning data. The PHSP data was then used to perform Monte Carlo simulations of TSET treatments delivered to a humanoid phantom and eight healthy participants who were all imaged standing in a Vectra WB360 photogrammetry system. Monte Carlo simulation results were visualized for qualitative analysis using in-house developed Python code, using the matplotlib module and 3D Slicer. The simulation calculations were compared against and past in vivo dose measurements to evaluate the performance of the Monte Carlo simulations in the context of clinical experience of TSET treatment delivery.

resultsThe near-instantaneous acquisition of photogrammetry images made the Vectra WB360 system appealing for potential patient imaging. Monte Carlo simulations generally took less than 2 h per beam and produced 3DDOSE files that ranged in size up to 1.75 GB before being reduced by 99% when summed and exported. Validation calculations generally agreed with measurements in water phantoms and the humanoid phantom, and the participant calculations resulted in a mean B factor of 2.8 ± 0.1 as well as useful illustrations of surface dose homogeneity that showed agreement between participant doses and published in vivo results, in terms of hot and cold spots.

conclusionsMonte Carlo simulations using the 3D surface imaging data were found to be useful in evaluating surface dose homogeneity and verifying the locations of hot and cold spots, potentially allowing shielding and boost interventions to be pre-planned. Ideally, 3D patient images derived from photogrammetry (or other surface scans) would be imported into a commercial treatment planning system and used in a more conventional treatment planning and delivery workflow.

Indexed as

ElectronsImaging, Three-DimensionalMonte Carlo MethodMycosis FungoidesPhantoms, ImagingPhotogrammetryRadiotherapy Planning, Computer-AssistedSkin NeoplasmsFeasibility StudiesHumansRadiometryRadiotherapy DosageRadiotherapy, Intensity-ModulatedMonte Carlophotogrammetrytotal skin electron therapyTSET

Identifiers

PMID42410922
PMCPMC13338102

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.