Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42410905›Full record

ArticleJournal of nursing management2026

Clarifying Nurse-Physician Dual Leadership in Acute Hospital Settings: A Walker and Avant Concept Analysis.

Ines Vercalsteren, Filip Haegdorens, Erik Franck

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of nursing management, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Ines VercalsterenWorkforce Management, Health Systems, and Outcome Research in Care (WORC) Group, Centre for Research and Innovation in Care, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium, uantwerpen.be.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0008-2211-1621
Filip HaegdorensWorkforce Management, Health Systems, and Outcome Research in Care (WORC) Group, Centre for Research and Innovation in Care, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium, uantwerpen.be.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1996-8786
Erik FranckWorkforce Management, Health Systems, and Outcome Research in Care (WORC) Group, Centre for Research and Innovation in Care, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium, uantwerpen.be.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7809-2265

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundNurse-physician dual leadership (NPDL) has gained attention in healthcare as a model particularly suited to innovation-driven environments, where the complex demands of leadership may outpace the capacities of a single leader. By combining the distinct yet complementary expertise of nurses and physicians, NPDL offers a hybrid structure that balances the clarity of single leadership with the breadth of shared leadership. Despite its growing presence in healthcare, the concept remains insufficiently defined in the literature.

aimTo clarify the concept of NPDL in acute hospital settings, ensuring consistent terminology and providing a solid foundation for further research, education and practice.

methodsConcept analysis guided by the Walker and Avant 8-step method. A systematic literature search was conducted through PubMed, ScienceDirect and Embase. Keywords included co-leadership, dual leadership and dyad leadership, with and without the prefix 'nurse-physician' and combined with healthcare-related terms. Peer-reviewed articles, books and grey literature, including definitions, attributes, antecedents, consequences and empirical referents, were identified and managed using EndNote. Of 247 identified articles, 23 were included, with eight additional sources retrieved through manual reference list searching.

resultsA definition of NPDL in acute hospital settings is proposed. Four defining attributes were identified: formalised dual leadership structure, joint responsibility, joint decision-making and role complementarity. The analysis also identified five antecedents that were categorised into organisational and relational factors. The consequences of NPDL include stronger leadership, enhanced interprofessional collaboration, improved decision-making and the presentation of a united leadership front.

conclusionNPDL can be defined as a collaborative leadership model in which two formal leaders, a nurse and a physician leader, work together as co-leaders, with different skill sets and without a power difference, and they are jointly accountable and responsible for the organisational or unit results. IMPACT: Clarifying the concept of NPDL enhances future research. It could inform policymakers and support both educators, who provide formal leadership training, and facilitators, who guide professional development through coaching and mentoring, in fostering effective collaboration between nurse and physician leaders. PATIENT OR PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT: This study did not include patient or public involvement in its design, conduct, or reporting.

Indexed as

Concept FormationLeadershipNursesPhysiciansHumansacute care settingsconcept analysishealthcare professionalsinterprofessional collaborationnurse leadersnurse–physician dual leadershipphysician leaders

Identifiers

PMID42410905
PMCPMC13338096

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.