ReviewMedicine2026
Traumatic stapediovestibular luxation: two contrasting cases highlighting the importance of early treatment decision: A case report and literature review.
Review in Medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
rationaleTraumatic stapediovestibular luxation is a rare but potentially devastating condition that may cause severe vertigo and hearing loss. Optimal management remains controversial because surgical manipulation around the stapes carries the risk of additional inner ear damage, whereas some patients recover with conservative treatment alone. PATIENT CONCERNS: Two patients presented with vertigo and hearing impairment after accidental penetrating ear trauma caused by cotton swabs. DIAGNOSES: High-resolution computed tomography demonstrated stapes footplate invagination into the vestibule in both cases.
interventionsIn Case 1, early surgical repositioning of the stapes was performed on the third day after injury because of complete footplate invagination accompanied by bone-conduction hearing loss and severe vertigo. In Case 2, conservative management was selected because bone-conduction thresholds were preserved and vestibular symptoms improved spontaneously. OUTCOMES: In Case 1, postoperative recovery included rapid resolution of vertigo and improvement of bone-conduction thresholds, particularly at low frequencies. In Case 2, vestibular symptoms resolved without surgery, although a mild residual air-bone gap remained. LESSONS: Bone-conduction deterioration, degree of footplate displacement, severity of vertigo, and depth of invagination on high-resolution computed tomography appear to be key factors for treatment selection. Conservative management may be safely continued in selected cases with mild posterior partial luxation and stable bone-conduction, whereas early surgical decision-making is essential when surgery is indicated to optimize vestibular and auditory outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.