Observational studyMedicine2026
Prospective evaluation of post-ERCP gastrointestinal dysfunction using the I-FEED scoring system: A cohort study.
Observational study in Medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
To determine the incidence of gastrointestinal dysfunction after ERCP, identify factors associated with its development, and evaluate the correlation between the I-FEED score and clinical outcomes, this single-center, prospective, observational cohort study consecutively enrolled patients undergoing elective ERCP, with 30-day follow-up. Inclusion criteria were: age ≥ 18 years and scheduled elective ERCP for any indication. Collected data included demographics, procedural details, I-FEED scores, length of stay, Quality of Recovery-9 scores, and 30-day readmission. The I-FEED score was the primary assessment tool. An I-FEED score ≥ 6 is defined as Post-ERCP gastrointestinal dysfunction (POGD). Analyses were performed using SPSS v25.0. Among 273 analyzed patients (59.34% male), choledocholithiasis was the most common indication (63.73%). POGD occurred in 54 patients (19.8%). Post-ERCP pancreatitis (PEP) was the most common condition associated with POGD (34 cases, 62.9%). Univariate analysis identified several factors associated with POGD, including younger age, suspected sphincter of Oddi dysfunction (SOD), PEP, cholangitis, bleeding, difficult cannulation, >1 pancreatic guidewire passage, pancreatic contrast injection, and pancreatic sphincterotomy. In multivariate analysis, younger age, suspected SOD, difficult cannulation, pancreatic sphincterotomy, and PEP were independently associated with POGD. An I-FEED score ≥ 6 was statistically significantly associated with: a longer median length of stay compared to scores < 6, a higher rate of nasogastric tube insertion, and lower patient satisfaction scores. POGD is a frequent and clinically significant occurrence after ERCP, affecting nearly one-fifth of patients. The I-FEED scoring system appears valuable for objectively assessing gastrointestinal recovery post-ERCP and may inform clinical management and postoperative care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.