ArticleMedicine2026
Investigation and analysis of rumination level and its associated factors in patients with thyroid cancer.
Article in Medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study aimed to understand the status of rumination in patients with thyroid cancer and analyze its associated factors, so as to provide reference for medical staff to implement personalized intervention according to the adjustable associated factors of cognitive processing after illness. A total of 159 patients with thyroid cancer were selected by convenient sampling method. The general information questionnaire, event-related Rumination Scale and social support rating scale were used to investigate the patients. SPSS 21.0 software was used for statistical analysis. The total score of rumination was (34.98 ± 7.72), invasive rumination was (16.84 ± 3.99) and purposeful rumination was (18.14 ± 5.00). Multiple linear regression analysis showed that gender, educational level and family per capita monthly income were the main factors associated with invasive rumination; educational level, marital status, family per capita monthly income and social support were the main factors associated with purposeful rumination. The level of rumination in patients with thyroid cancer is relatively high. In clinical work, we should pay more attention to female patients, those with low educational level, unmarried patients, those with low family per capita monthly income and those with poor social support.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.