ArticleAmerican journal of industrial medicine2026
Essential, Yet Precarious, Mistreated, Sick and Medicalized: A Sequential Explanatory Mixed-Methods Study on Homecare Aides in Spain.
Article in American journal of industrial medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundHomecare aides (HCAs) are professional non-family caregivers, who support dependent individuals to live at home with dignity; yet in Spain they remain understudied and vulnerable, often facing precarious working conditions. We aimed to characterize HCAs' employment, living conditions, health, and exposure to workplace violence and harassment, considering migrant background as a key axis of inequality.
methodsWe conducted a sequential explanatory mixed-methods study. Quantitative data came from an online respondent-driven sampling survey of 324 HCAs across Spain, with stratified analyses by migrant background. Qualitative data were obtained through three focus groups and analyzed using qualitative content analysis. Findings were triangulated during interpretation.
resultsThe findings suggest that precariousness extends beyond the workplace, affecting everyday life, social relationships, and health. Quantitative results showed poorer health, higher exposure to workplace violence, and greater drug use among migrant HCAs. While the qualitative data did not fully account for these differences, they offered insight into possible underlying mechanisms, such as physically demanding work and lack of resources. Qualitative findings also confirmed greater exposure to different forms of violence and sexual harassment among migrant HCAs, while revealing broader gendered patterns of violence affecting the occupation as a whole.
conclusionsA vicious circle of poverty, poor health, and workplace violence/discrimination emerges, described by HCAs as their being "poor and enslaved." Migration background influences inequalities, but widespread structural precariousness tends to homogenize experiences, while gender dynamics further shape vulnerability. Urgent intersectional policies are needed to ensure decent work and protect HCAs' health and rights.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.