ArticleBMC women's health2026
Factors influencing preference for short-term over long-term contraceptives among women in northern Uganda. A mixed-methods study.
Article in BMC women's health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionModern contraceptives have contributed to reduction of unintended pregnancy among the women of reproductive age (15 to 49) globally. Use of long-term reversible contraceptives is low (13%) in Uganda yet they are cost-effective. This study aimed to identify factors influencing preference of short-term reversible contraceptives over long-term methods among women of reproductive age attending the family planning clinic at Lira Regional Referral Hospital (LRRH).
methodWe performed a mixed-methods cross-sectional study, in which structured interviews were administered to 220 family planning users from December 2022-February 2023, data were analyzed using IBM SPSS Statistics version 29 and cleaned prior to analysis. Descriptive statistical analyses were performed to summarize participant characteristics and contraceptive preferences, and results were presented using tables and figures. Frequencies, percentages, and cross-tabulations were computed. Bivariate analysis using binary logistic regression was conducted to assess associations between independent variables and preference for short-term versus long-term reversible contraceptive methods. Crude odds ratios (CORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were reported. Variables with a p-value ≤ 0.05 at bivariate analysis were included in a multivariate binary logistic regression model to identify independent predictors of contraceptive method preference. Adjusted odds ratios (AORs) with 95% CI were calculated, and statistical significance was set at p-value ≤ 0.05. Qualitative data were audio-recorded, transcribed verbatim, and analyzed using applied thematic analysis. Atlas.ti version 23 was used to support data organization and coding. Analysis followed an iterative process involving open coding, development of summary memos, and construction of a structured codebook. Related codes were grouped into overarching domains, with sub-themes used to organize emerging patterns. Coded transcripts were reviewed and synthesized, and representative participant quotes were selected to provide contextual understanding of factors influencing women's contraceptive method preferences. Discrepancies in coding and interpretation were resolved through consensus discussions among the research team. Ethical approval was obtained from Gulu Research and Ethics Committee (GUREC), and administrative clearance from Lira Regional Referral Hospital and Informed consent /assent from study participants.
resultsOf 220 women 63.6% preferred short term, 36.4% preferred long-term reversible contraceptive methods. Age between 25-34 years were 47.7%, 91.8% were married, and 70.5% attained primary education. Reasons for preference of short-term contraceptives were; less side effects 50%, protection for a short period of time 21.4%, confidentiality 28.6%. Partners approval (AOR: 0.253, 95% CI: 0.194-0.680, P=0.006), was significantly associated with short term preference. Providers cited confidentiality, quick return to fertility, and of methods availability as influence for short-term preference.
conclusionThis study found that women of reproductive age predominantly preferred short-term reversible contraceptive methods. Despite the effectiveness and cost-efficiency of long-acting contraceptives, their uptake remains low due to socio-cultural factors, misconceptions, and health system barriers. Strengthened client-centered counseling, consistent method availability, community education, and male engagement are essential to improve informed choice and increase uptake of long-acting reversible contraceptives.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.