Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42410583›Full record

ArticleBMC nursing2026

Moral distress and job satisfaction among oncology and hematology nurses in Saudi Arabia.

Naelah Almutairi, Noor Alshareef, Khulud Abudawood

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC nursing, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Naelah AlmutairiHematology Stem Cell Transplant Unit, Ministry of National Guard Health Affairs, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Noor AlshareefHealth Services and Hospital Administration Department, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.
Khulud AbudawoodCollege of Nursing, King Saud bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia. abudawoodk@ksau-hs.edu.sa.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4639-2129

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMoral distress is an important ethical concern among oncology and hematology nurses and may reduce job satisfaction and retention. This study examined moral distress, job satisfaction, their relationship, and associated factors among oncology and hematology nurses in Saudi Arabia.

methodsA quantitative cross-sectional study was conducted among 97 nurses at King Abdul-Aziz Medical City, Jeddah. Data were collected using the Moral Distress Scale-Revised and the Minnesota Satisfaction Questionnaire short form and analyzed using descriptive statistics, group comparisons, correlation, and linear regression.

resultsNurses reported mild moral distress (mean 70.58, SD 57.81) and moderate job satisfaction (mean 61.52, SD 13.35). Moral distress was significantly negatively correlated with job satisfaction (r = -0.510, p < 0.001). Higher moral distress was associated with female gender, Saudi nationality, regular shifts, lower educational preparation, junior job title, and lower income. Job satisfaction was associated with work area, shift pattern, years of experience, income, and moral distress.

conclusionsMoral distress remains an important issue in oncology and hematology nursing and is associated with lower job satisfaction. Targeted organizational support may help improve ethical practice environments and nurse well-being.

Indexed as

Ethical climateHematologyJob satisfactionMoral distressOncology nursesSaudi Arabia

Identifiers

PMID42410583
PMCPMC13348636

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.