ArticleBMC geriatrics2026
Comparison of hip abduction range of motion and strength and ankle dorsiflexion in older adults with and without a history of falls.
Article in BMC geriatrics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
background and purposeFalls are among the most serious complications of aging, leading to disability, reduced quality of life, and even mortality. "Evidence suggests that weakness in proximal muscles (such as the hip abductors) and distal muscles (such as the ankle dorsiflexors) may contribute to impaired balance and increased fall risk in older adults." However, few studies have simultaneously compared both the range of motion and strength of these two muscle groups in older adults with and without a history of falls. The aim of the present study was to compare hip abduction and ankle dorsiflexion range of motion and strength between older adults with and without a history of falls.
methodsThis cross-sectional comparative study included 60 community-dwelling older adults (30 with and 30 without a history of falls within the past 6 months). Range of motion was measured using a universal goniometer, and isometric muscle strength was assessed using a handheld dynamometer. Data were analyzed using the independent samples t-test at a significance level of p < 0.05.
resultsNo significant difference was observed between the two groups in hip abduction range of motion (p = 0.188). However, the group without a history of falls demonstrated greater hip abduction strength (p < 0.001), ankle dorsiflexion range of motion (p < 0.001), and ankle dorsiflexor strength (p < 0.001).
conclusionConcurrent weakness in the hip abductors and ankle dorsiflexors may be associated with an increased risk of falls in older adults. Combined assessment of muscle strength and range of motion in these regions may assist in identifying older adults with characteristics associated with fall history.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.