ArticleBMC geriatrics2026
Assessing loneliness in later life: validation of the De Jong Gierveld Loneliness Scale for Portuguese older adults.
Article in BMC geriatrics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Assessing loneliness is essential to better understand older adults' mental health needs and to inform timely and appropriate interventions. The De Jong Gierveld Loneliness Scale (DJGLS) is one of the most widely used measures of loneliness worldwide. However, there is no evidence regarding its psychometric adequacy for older adults in Portugal. This study analysed the psychometric properties (validity and reliability) of the Portuguese version of the DJGLS (both the 11-item and 6-item versions) for community-dwelling older adults. A cross-sectional study was conducted with 466 participants. Construct, convergent and divergent validity were evaluated, and test-retest reliability was assessed using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) and Bland-Altman plots. The 11-item DJGLS showed a bifactor structure with a general loneliness factor and two specific factors (social and emotional loneliness), with good model fi, whereas the 6-item DJGLS demonstrated excellent fit. Both versions showed a significant correlation with ULCA-16 (r ≥ 0.6), adequate internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha = 0.8 (11 item) and 0.67 (6 item)), excellent test-retest (two-weeks) reliability (ICC ≥ 0.9) and acceptable agreement on the Bland-Altman plots, without evidence of proportional biases. The Portuguese versions of the DJGLS-11 and DJGLS-6 are valid and reliable instruments for assessing loneliness in Portuguese community-dwelling older adults, supporting their use in research and screening contexts. The validated version of the DJGLS enable the assessment of social and emotional loneliness, expanding the range of loneliness measures currently available in Portugal.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.