Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42410487›Full record

ArticleJournal of animal science and biotechnology2026

Substituting maize and soybean meal with non-conventional feed ingredients: environmental trade-offs and resource-saving potential in China's pig production.

Qile Hu, Xue Bao, Nuo Xiao, Yuansen Yang, Changhua Lai, Lu Wang, Shuai Zhang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of animal science and biotechnology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Qile Hu *State Key Laboratory of Animal Nutrition and Feeding, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs Feed Industry Centre, College of Animal Science and Technology, China Agricultural University, Beijing, 100193, P. R. China.
Xue Bao *State Key Laboratory of Animal Nutrition and Feeding, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs Feed Industry Centre, College of Animal Science and Technology, China Agricultural University, Beijing, 100193, P. R. China.
Nuo XiaoState Key Laboratory of Animal Nutrition and Feeding, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs Feed Industry Centre, College of Animal Science and Technology, China Agricultural University, Beijing, 100193, P. R. China.
Yuansen YangState Key Laboratory of Animal Nutrition and Feeding, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs Feed Industry Centre, College of Animal Science and Technology, China Agricultural University, Beijing, 100193, P. R. China.
Changhua LaiState Key Laboratory of Animal Nutrition and Feeding, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs Feed Industry Centre, College of Animal Science and Technology, China Agricultural University, Beijing, 100193, P. R. China.
Lu WangState Key Laboratory of Animal Nutrition and Feeding, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs Feed Industry Centre, College of Animal Science and Technology, China Agricultural University, Beijing, 100193, P. R. China.
Shuai ZhangState Key Laboratory of Animal Nutrition and Feeding, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs Feed Industry Centre, College of Animal Science and Technology, China Agricultural University, Beijing, 100193, P. R. China. zhangshuai16@cau.edu.cn.

Funding

Chinese Universities Scientific Fund 2025TC005National Key Research and Development Program of China MOST, 2021YFD1300205-8 and 2021YFD1300205-9
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundChina produces approximately one-quarter of the world's grain with less than 9% of global arable land; however, more than half of this production is used for animal feed. Meanwhile, the feed system in China has long been highly dependent on conventional ingredients such as maize and soybean meal, resulting in a relatively homogeneous feed structure. Under the dual objectives of developing a diversified feed supply system and promoting sustainable livestock production, expanding the utilization of non-conventional feed ingredients (NCFIs) has become an important pathway. In this context, systematically quantifying their potential for greenhouse gas mitigation is essential for advancing the green and low-carbon transition of agriculture. Taking 1 kg live-weight gain in growing-finishing pigs as the functional unit (FU), three scenarios were designed to evaluate the life-cycle carbon footprint, nitrogen footprint, land use, and grain-saving effects of substituting maize and soybean meal with ten NCFIs in diets for 25-120 kg pigs across the complete "crop-pig-manure" chain.

resultsMarked inter-type variability in environmental profiles was observed among the ten NCFIs: carbon footprint ranged from 2.46 to 2.84 kg CO

conclusionCollectively, the NCFI strategy exhibits environmental trade-offs: while generally favorable for carbon reduction, the mitigation efficacy is feed ingredients-dependent, and adverse impacts on nitrogen emissions and land use must be managed. Cassava exhibits the greatest mitigation potential, whereas sorghum requires more careful formulation and supply chain management. These findings corroborate the substantial resource-replacement capacity of NCFIs and provide a quantitative basis for developing low-carbon, resource-efficient livestock systems.

Indexed as

Environmental impactsFeed resource supplyLife-cycle assessmentNon-conventional feed ingredientsPig production systems

Identifiers

PMID42410487
PMCPMC13340116

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.