ArticleBMC medical informatics and decision making2026
Physicians' preferences for the use of clinical decision support systems in the context of acutely ill children presenting to ambulatory care: a focus group study.
Article in BMC medical informatics and decision making, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAcutely ill children are at risk of receiving unnecessary antibiotic prescriptions, yet within this context, clinical decision support systems (CDSS) have the potential to improve clinicians' prescribing behaviour. Since the uptake of CDSS is limited, research into the facilitators and barriers to its use and the preferred content and functions is needed to promote its use.
methodsFour focus groups were conducted among Belgian general practitioners, paediatricians, and ear/nose/throat physicians. The groups took place in a university building, a regional hospital, and online, and were semi-structured according to the interview guide. We transcribed recordings and performed reflexive thematic analysis. All participants were asked to provide feedback on the final themes.
resultsTwenty-five physicians participated in the study. The analysis produced four themes: (i) Physicians prefer a pragmatic approach completing the CDSS, with as little additional work as possible; (ii) The comprehensive advice given by the CDSS should be concise, unambiguous, and presented clearly; (iii) The CDSS can reduce diagnostic uncertainty, especially by making physicians aware of alarm symptoms of serious illness; (iv) The scope should be determined beforehand, and implementation should consider reliability and technical barriers. Participants proposed several possibilities for the content and functions of the CDSS, which are informed by their workload, clinical uncertainty, and their emphasis on professional autonomy.
conclusionsThe results of this study contribute to the development of a user-friendly CDSS for the assessment of acutely ill children in ambulatory care. Physicians prefer a CDSS that is pragmatic to apply and shows clear guidance on diagnostics and disease management, including support to reduce uncertainty regarding illness severity. The implementation of a CDSS plays a pivotal role in enhancing antimicrobial stewardship.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.