Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42410430›Full record

ReviewCritical care (London, England)2026

Prevention of arterial catheter-related bloodstream infections: current evidence and future directions.

Viviane Donner, Christine D Sadeghi, Gaud Catho, Jean-François Timsit, Giovanni Satta, Claire M Rickard, Leonard Mermel, Niccolò Buetti

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Critical care (London, England), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Viviane Donner *Department of Emergency Medicine, Fribourg Cantonal Hospital, Ch. des Pensionnats 2-6, Fribourg, CH 1700, Switzerland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2363-6744
Christine D Sadeghi *Department of Intensive Care Medicine, Fribourg Cantonal Hospital, Ch. des Pensionnats 2-6, Fribourg, CH 1700, Switzerland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0003-2947-6846
Gaud CathoInfection Control Program, Faculty of Medicine, Geneva University Hospitals, World Health Organization Collaborating Centre, Geneva, Switzerland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4948-0944
Jean-François TimsitAPHP Bichat University Hospital Medical and Infectious Diseases ICU, Paris, 75018, France.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6063-7383
Giovanni SattaCentre for Clinical Microbiology, Division of Infection and Immunity, University College London, London, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0120-7885
Claire M RickardHerston Infectious Diseases Institute, Metro North Health, RBWH Herston, Brisbane, 4006, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6341-7415
Leonard MermelDepartment of Epidemiology & Infection Prevention, Brown University Health, Providence, Rhode Island, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8898-7406
Niccolò BuettiInfection Control Program, Faculty of Medicine, Geneva University Hospitals, World Health Organization Collaborating Centre, Geneva, Switzerland. niccolo.buetti@hug.ch.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8096-1834

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Arterial catheters (ACs) are essential devices widely used for hemodynamic monitoring and blood sampling. Whilst their infectious risk is well-known, the surveillance and identification of arterial catheter-related bloodstream infections (AC-CRBSI) remains underappreciated, and guidelines recommending best practices to prevent infection are few and inconsistent. Most evidence for AC infection prevention is inferred from studies focused on central venous catheter infection prevention. Few studies have directly explored optimal infection prevention strategies for ACs. For AC-CRBSI prevention, several strategies are valuable during insertion and maintenance of the catheter: minimisation of catheter-days by appropriate catheter stewardship, procedural training of providers, standardisation of insertion packs to promote adherence to an insertion bundle, cutaneous antisepsis with an alcohol-based 2% chlorhexidine solution during insertion and maintenance, chlorhexidine impregnated dressings, change of dressing every 7 days unless visibly disrupted or soiled, hand hygiene, disinfection of the access port and change of administration sets every 7 days. Other interventions to prevent AC-CRBSI are more controversial and necessitate further research such as the choice of the insertion site (femoral vs. radial), the type of sterile barrier precautions and their cost effectiveness, the infectious risk related to ultrasound guidance, the optimal catheter securement device, the utility of needleless connectors and closed loop blood sampling systems and the effectiveness of scheduled catheter changes. Arterial catheters demonstrate an ongoing risk of contamination throughout their lifespan, from insertion to removal. A comprehensive prevention strategy should address the entire arterial catheter lifecycle and is most effective when implemented as a bundled approach. This review summarises current knowledge on AC-CRBSI prevention during the entire lifecycle of the catheter and identifies priorities for future research.

Indexed as

Catheterization, PeripheralCatheter-Related InfectionsInfection ControlHumansArterial catheterCatheter related bloodstream infectionCatheter related infection preventionPeripheral arterial catheter

Identifiers

PMID42410430
PMCPMC13386913

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.