ArticleBMC nursing2026
Evidence-based nursing practice for the removal of peripheral arterial catheters in adult patients.
Article in BMC nursing, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo establish a standard procedure for the removal of peripheral arterial catheters (AC) in critically ill adult patients through the application of the best evidence for the removal of AC.
methods16 best evidences were summarized through systematic retrieval and quality evaluation of the topics related to the removal of AC. 9 evidence-based quality examination standards were formulated based on clinical scenarios and professional judgment. The review indicators were implemented using the Johns Hopkins nursing evidence-based practice model in the Cardiovascular Surgery Intensive Care Unit.
resultsAfter the second round of examination, the compliance rate of review indicators was significantly higher than before (P < 0.05), and the incidence of complications in patients significantly decreased (P < 0.05).
conclusionThe implementation of the evidence-based practice protocol for the removal of AC in adults has standardized the procedure for AC removal and enhanced the safety of the process. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER: Not applicable.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.