Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42410419›Full record

ArticleBMC medical education2026

A comparative evaluation of preclinical and clinical dental students' knowledge of teledentistry and artificial intelligence.

Beyza Betul Sencan, Merve Botsali, Tüba Bayat

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical education, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Beyza Betul SencanDepartment of Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Sakarya University, Sakarya, Turkey. beyzasencan@sakarya.edu.tr.
Merve BotsaliDepartment of Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Sakarya University, Sakarya, Turkey.
Tüba BayatDepartment of Periodontology, Faculty of Dentistry, Sakarya University, Sakarya, Turkey.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionDigitalization, which is rapidly increasing its influence across many fields, has also led to a significant transformation in dentistry, evolving into a fundamental component that dentists are expected to master alongside traditional practices. Within this transformation in digital dentistry, teledentistry and artificial intelligence applications have emerged as prominent areas of focus. This study aimed to evaluate dental students' knowledge, attitudes, and perceptions regarding teledentistry and artificial intelligence-supported systems. It also investigated their views on the future applications of these technologies and compared the awareness and expectations of preclinical and clinical students.

methodsThis descriptive cross-sectional study was conducted among dentistry students at the Faculty of Dentistry, Sakarya University, including both preclinical and clinical levels. Data were collected using an 18-item structured questionnaire developed by the researchers and administered online via Google Forms. The internal consistency of the questionnaire was assessed using Cronbach's Alpha, and multiple linear regression analysis was performed to identify predictors of teledentistry knowledge levels. Statistical analyses were performed using IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 22.0. Descriptive statistics (frequencies and percentages) were calculated, and Chi-square tests were used to compare categorical variables. A p-value of < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

resultsA total of 368 students participated in the study, of whom 237 were female and 131 were male; 156 were preclinical and 212 were clinical students. Clinical students demonstrated significantly higher knowledge regarding the purpose of artificial intelligence-based system usage in teledentistry compared with preclinical students (p < 0.05). Additionally, a significant difference was found in the sources of information about teledentistry between the two groups (p < 0.05). Social media was the most common information source for both groups, while a higher proportion of preclinical students reported having no prior knowledge of teledentistry (64.7%). Most participants identified artificial intelligence and big data analytics as the most influential technologies for the future development of teledentistry.

conclusionsIntegrating teledentistry and artificial intelligence more extensively into undergraduate dental education may enhance future dentists' competence in digital dentistry and better prepare them to adapt to rapidly evolving technological advancements in the profession. The findings also indicate that dental students generally demonstrate positive attitudes toward AI-supported teledentistry despite having limited knowledge levels, with clinical students showing higher levels of awareness compared with preclinical students.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceEducation, DentalHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeStudents, DentalAdultAttitude of Health PersonnelCross-Sectional StudiesDigital HealthFemaleHumansMaleSurveys and QuestionnairesYoung AdultArtificial intelligenceDental studentTeledentistry

Identifiers

PMID42410419
PMCPMC13625464

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.