ReviewBMC surgery2026
Absent gallbladder discovered during evaluation for biliary pain: case report and literature review.
Review in BMC surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionGallbladder Agenesis (GA) is a rare congenital anomaly of the biliary tract with reported incidence estimates at 0.03% in general clinical series. Although many patients are asymptomatic, up to half may present with biliary-type symptoms, creating a diagnostic challenge; routine imaging such as ultrasound or Hepatobiliary Iminodiacetic Acid scan (HIDA) may be misleading, and Magnetic Resonance Cholangio-Pancreatography (MRCP) is often required to establish the diagnosis and avoid unnecessary surgery. CASE PRESENTATION: We report the case of an adult patient presenting with mild biliary-type pain clinically suggestive of gallstone disease. Initial abdominal ultrasonography was inconclusive, failing to clearly visualize the gallbladder and raising suspicion of a contracted or scleroatrophic gallbladder. Further evaluation with Magnetic Resonance Cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) demonstrated complete absence of the gallbladder with compensatory dilation of the common bile duct (CBD), confirming the diagnosis of GA. The patient was managed conservatively with symptomatic treatment and dietary modifications, leading to significant clinical improvement and a significant regression of symptoms.
conclusionGA is an uncommon but important differential diagnosis in patients presenting with biliary-type pain when the gallbladder is not visualized on ultrasonography. In cases of diagnostic uncertainty, early use of MRCP is crucial to accurately define biliary anatomy and may prevent unnecessary surgical exploration and associated iatrogenic biliary injury. A structured diagnostic approach based on early cross-sectional imaging is essential to reduce diagnostic delay and avoid potentially preventable operative complications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.