ArticleBMC medical imaging2026
Multisequence MRI and clinical data-based deep learning radiomics model for predicting adjacent segment degeneration post-lumbar fusion: a retrospective multicenter study.
Article in BMC medical imaging, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundWhile adjacent segment degeneration (ASDeg) is a major complication following lumbar fusion, objective tools for preoperative risk prediction remain lacking. This study developed a model integrating clinical data, deep learning, and radiomic features from multisequence magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) to predict high-risk patients for ASDeg after lumbar fusion.
methodsThis study included 305 patients who underwent lumbar MRI before surgery. The patients were randomly divided into a training cohort (n = 192) and an internal validation cohort (n = 83). An external test cohort (n = 30) was recruited from two additional centers. The Vision Transformer 3D model architecture was used for model development. Deep learning-based and handcrafted radiomic features were extracted from multisequence MR images of patients. A logistic regression model incorporating the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator was established, and both radiomic feature and deep learning radiomics (DLR) feature classification models were developed. ASDeg was defined as degeneration observed during radiological follow-up > 6 months after lumbar surgery and served as the reference standard. The performance of 14 machine learning classification models in predicting high-risk patients for ASDeg was evaluated using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves. A combined model was developed by integrating clinical baseline variables.
resultsAfter feature selection, 17 handcrafted radiomic features, 12 DLR features, and three clinical features were ultimately selected. The most effective machine learning algorithm for the radiomic feature model was the linear support vector machine, and AdaBoost was the best performing algorithm for the DLR feature model. By combining these features with clinical features, a combined model was developed, with the gradient boosting machine being the most effective machine learning algorithm. The AUCs for training, internal validation, and external test cohorts were 0.959, 0.818, and 0.895, respectively. Compared to the combined predictions of two spinal surgeons, the combined model also demonstrated superior performance. Calibration curves showed better calibration in the validation set. Decision curve analysis demonstrated greater net benefit for patients.
conclusionsThe combined model effectively identified patients at high risk of ASDeg following lumbar fusion based on clinical characteristics and MRI, which may help reduce revision surgeries and alleviate the burden on the public healthcare system. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER: Not applicable.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.