ArticleInternational journal of emergency medicine2026
War-related penetrating cervicothoracic trauma managed in a resource-limited hospital in Syria: a case series.
Article in International journal of emergency medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Correction: War-related penetrating cervicothoracic trauma managed in a resource-limited hospital in Syria: a case series.International journal of emergency medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPenetrating cervicothoracic trauma in war is time-critical because airway, major vascular, and aerodigestive injuries may coexist, rapidly causing hypoxemia, exsanguination, or pleural/mediastinal contamination. CT can support triage and operative planning in transportable patients, while bronchoscopy, vascular imaging, and contrast/endoscopic esophageal studies may further refine assessment when available. CASE PRESENTATION: We reviewed consecutive war-related penetrating neck/upper-chest injuries treated at a military hospital in Syria between 2015 and 2017. Inclusion required intraoperative confirmation of tracheal, major thoracic vascular, or esophageal injury. Three male patients underwent emergency surgery. Case 1 presented with profound hypoxemia, extensive subcutaneous emphysema, pneumomediastinum, and persistent massive air leak after drainage. CT suggested tracheal disruption; right thoracotomy revealed a longitudinal tracheal laceration with tissue loss approximately 3 cm below the cricoid, extending 2 cm. Case 2 arrived in profound shock with absent left upper-limb pulses and massive hemothorax; trap-door exploration identified complete left subclavian artery transection. Case 3 had CT evidence of a retained projectile near the mid-esophagus and right hemopneumothorax; food-like pleural drainage prompted thoracotomy, confirming a 4-cm mid-esophageal tear. CASE DISCUSSION: Management was physiology-driven. The tracheal injury was repaired with interrupted absorbable sutures and intercostal muscle-flap buttress. The subclavian artery was reconstructed with an interposition graft, restoring distal pulses. The esophageal injury underwent primary repair with broad-spectrum antimicrobials.
conclusionIn austere conflict settings, CT-informed triage plus decisive operative management can be lifesaving, but imaging should not delay exploration when hard clinical signs persist.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.