ArticleBMC neurology2026
Complex vasculitic overlap: temporal arteritis complicating suspected neuro-behçet disease with recurrent ischemic injury.
Article in BMC neurology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundVasculitic disorders can present with overlapping clinical and radiologic features, complicating diagnosis and management. Differentiating between Behçet disease-associated vasculitis and giant cell arteritis (GCA) is particularly challenging but essential for appropriate treatment. CASE PRESENTATION: A 49-year-old woman with a history of recurrent venous and arterial thrombosis and suspected Behçet disease presented with severe temporal headache and acute focal neurological deficits. INVESTIGATIONS: Neuroimaging revealed a chronic ischemic infarct with occlusion of the right internal carotid artery and collateral circulation, without evidence of active intracranial vasculitis. Laboratory studies demonstrated elevated inflammatory markers. Vascular imaging showed inflammatory changes involving the superficial temporal artery. DIAGNOSIS: Based on the presence of temporal headache, raised inflammatory markers, imaging evidence of superficial temporal artery inflammation, and exclusion of alternative causes, a diagnosis of giant cell arteritis was considered most likely in the setting of a complex vasculitic background. MANAGEMENT: High-dose systemic corticosteroid therapy was initiated. OUTCOME AND FOLLOW-UP: The patient showed marked clinical improvement following treatment, with resolution of headache and stabilization of neurological deficits. She continues under multidisciplinary follow-up for monitoring of disease activity and thrombotic risk.
conclusionThis case highlights the diagnostic challenges of overlapping vasculitic syndromes and emphasizes the importance of integrating clinical findings, imaging results, and therapeutic response in guiding management of suspected giant cell arteritis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.