ArticleBritish journal of haematology2026
Comparative effectiveness of chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy versus historical controls in patients with relapse/refractory aggressive B-cell lymphoma: An indirect treatment comparison in the real-world setting.
Article in British journal of haematology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
18 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Single-arm studies demonstrate dramatic improvements in survival in patients with relapsed/refractory (R/R) aggressive B-cell lymphomas but with significant toxicities and at exceptionally high costs. The objective of this study was to evaluate the real-world health outcomes of aggressive B-cell lymphoma patients treated with publicly funded chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy in Ontario, Canada, compared to historical controls. We conducted a population-based retrospective cohort study among patients treated for R/R aggressive B-cell lymphoma in Ontario between January 2013 and June 2023. The cohort consisted of patients who received commercially available CAR T cells between 1 January 2019 and 30 June 2023 and historical controls who were treated with the standard of care between 1 January 2013 and 31 December 2018, before public funding for CAR T-cell treatments was available. Inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) was used to balance patients' characteristics across the two groups. The cohort included 314 CAR T-cell patients and 106 historical controls. The median follow-up time was 29.6 months (95% confidence interval [CI]: 26.1-33.0), and the median overall survival was 15.1 months (95% CI, 11.1-26.3) and 4.8 months (95% CI, 3.8-6.4) for CAR T-cell-treated patients and historical controls (hazard ratio 0.50, 95% CI 0.38-0.65) respectively. These results support the benefit of CAR T-cell treatment for patients with R/R aggressive B-cell lymphoma in routine clinical care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.