Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42410292›Full record

ArticleArchives of sexual behavior2026

A Machine Learning Study of Predictors of Homophobia Across the Globe.

Mohsen Joshanloo

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Archives of sexual behavior, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Mohsen JoshanlooDepartment of Psychology, Keimyung University, 1095 Dalgubeol Boulevard, Dalseo-Gu, Daegu, 42601, South Korea. mjoshanloo@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0001-9350-6219

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Much of the existing research on homophobia has focused on a limited range of correlates, typically within single-country contexts. The present study employed a machine learning approach (Random Forest) to analyze more than 350 potential predictors of homophobia using data from the World Values Survey across 62 countries. The analysis identified eight broad clusters of variables, comprising 78 top predictors associated with homophobic attitudes: (1) traditional moral norms and sexual conservatism, (2) religious beliefs and practices, (3) authoritarianism and social conformity, (4) xenophobia and outgroup distrust, (5) low civic engagement, (6) traditional gender, family, and work values, (7) limited digital engagement, and (8) perceived societal threat and insecurity. Sexual-moral traditionalism, gender and family conservatism, exclusivist, ethnocentric beliefs, and being a Muslim emerged as the top predictors (i.e., they showed the strongest associations with homophobia after accounting for the other variables in the model). These findings suggest that homophobia is not an isolated attitude but is embedded within a broader ideological framework characterized by rigid social norms, group-based distrust, adherence to traditional values, and a sense of perceived threat. Identifying these clusters and ranking predictors by their predictive strength improves our understanding of the psychological and sociocultural bases of homophobia and informs priorities for future research and intervention design.

Indexed as

HomophobiaMachine LearningAttitudeFemaleHumansMaleSocial GroupHomophobiaMachine learningSexual orientationSexual prejudiceWorld Values Survey

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.