ArticleAttention, perception & psychophysics2026
How does optical blur affect audiovisual speech perception and emotion perception?
Article in Attention, perception & psychophysics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study investigated how optical blur affects the auditory-based perception of speech and emotion within a unified experimental paradigm. It is widely known that auditory judgments of speech and emotion are strongly influenced by visual information (e.g., the speaker's lip movements or facial expressions). However, it remains unclear to what extent such visual influence is modulated similarly across speech and emotion perception under visual degradation. We investigated this issue by using optical blur to degrade audiovisual stimuli, requiring participants to judge speech and emotion based on auditory information. The results showed that visual influence persisted in both tasks even when stimuli were blurred. Crucially, however, the patterns of visual influence differed between the tasks. Specifically, as blurring increased, the visual influence started to decrease at a slightly higher spatial frequency cutoff in speech perception (6.7 cycles per face-width; cpf) than in emotion perception (5 cpf), indicating that speech perception is more sensitive to optical blur. Interestingly, however, the visual influence remained significant even under the most severe blur (3.3 cpf) in speech perception but not in emotion perception, suggesting a relatively higher persistence of visual influence in speech perception. These findings suggest that optical blur differentially modulates visual influence across perceptual domains, leading us to propose that the multisensory perceptual system dynamically calibrates sensory weights based on visual reliability in a task-dependent manner. OPEN PRACTICES STATEMENT: The experiment stimuli, trial-level, data, and analysis code for the generalized linear models are provided at this repository: https://osf.io/73tby/overview?view_only=3be0b6ee895e4823a6d1466494a8aadf . The present study was not preregistered.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42410285What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.