Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42410270›Full record

ReviewRadiologie (Heidelberg, Germany)2026

[The digital patient journey in radiological emergencies : Massive hemoptysis as a stress test of interoperability].

Elif Can, Nedim C Beste

Abstract readEnglish AbstractReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Radiologie (Heidelberg, Germany), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Elif CanSektion Interventionelle Radiologie, Klinik für Diagnostische und Interventionelle Radiologie, Universitätsklinikum Freiburg, Medizinische Fakultät, Albert-Ludwigs-Universität Freiburg, Hugstetter Straße 55, 79106, Freiburg, Deutschland. elif.can@uniklinik-freiburg.de.
Nedim C BesteInstitut für Diagnostische und Interventionelle Radiologie, Universitätsklinikum Köln, Kerpener Straße 62, 50937, Köln, Deutschland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

clinical issueMassive hemoptysis is a life-threatening emergency in which the risk of asphyxiation predominates over blood loss. The situation becomes particularly challenging when a patient must be transferred from an external facility and clinically relevant information is incomplete. DIAGNOSTIC WORK-UP: The initial diagnostic workup already begins prior to transfer to a specialized center. Initial priorities are oxygenation, correct patient positioning, and early airway protection. Depending on the local infrastructure, computed tomography (CT) angiography and bronchoscopy are the preferred modes of imaging. Structured, digital transfer of information, results, and imaging data without loss of data is paramount. STANDARD TREATMENT: In peripheral or systemic bleeding, bronchial artery embolization is the first-line therapeutic option and should be performed at a specialized center. A superselective technique, strict nontarget prevention, and adherence to established standard operating procedure (SOP) principles are essential. Massive hemoptysis is an example for the digital patient journey in radiological emergencies: when preliminary diagnostics are performed at an external hospital and definitive treatment is provided at a specialized center, the structured and rapid transfer of clinical information to that center is critical for quality of treatment. DIGITAL INFRASTRUCTURE AND INTEROPERABILITY: Emergency datasets on the electronic health card, the electronic patient record, and technical standards (FHIR, DICOM, and DICOMweb) are clinically relevant. European infrastructures (MyHealth@EU, European Health Data Space) may support the future of structured access to key clinical information and direct exchange of imaging data; however, they have not yet been fully integrated into routine emergency radiological practice.

conclusionIn radiological emergencies, interoperability is not merely a technical feature but a safety-relevant infrastructure component. It improves data triage, reduces media discontinuity, and may help prevent unnecessary repeat imaging. PRACTICAL RECOMMENDATIONS: In radiological emergencies, it must be assessed at an early stage whether further treatment in an interventional center is necessary. In these cases, relevant data and clinical information should be transferred in a structured and fully digital manner without loss of information.

Indexed as

HemoptysisPatient TransferBronchoscopyComputed Tomography AngiographyDigital HealthElectronic Health RecordsEmbolization, TherapeuticEmergenciesHumansBronchial artery embolizationComputed tomography angiographyElectronic patient recordInteroperabilityMedia break

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.