Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42410267›Full record

ReviewBehavior research methods2026

PyLossless: A non-destructive EEG processing pipeline.

Scott Huberty, James Desjardins, Tyler Collins, Mayada Elsabbagh, Christian O'Reilly

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Behavior research methods, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Scott HubertyMontreal Neurological Institute-Hospital, McGill University, Montreal, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2637-031X
James DesjardinsCompute Ontario, St. Catharines, Canada.
Tyler CollinsCompute Ontario, St. Catharines, Canada.
Mayada ElsabbaghMontreal Neurological Institute-Hospital, McGill University, Montreal, Canada.
Christian O'ReillyDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC, USA. christian.oreilly@sc.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3149-4934

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

EEG recordings are typically long and contain large amounts of data, making manual cleaning a time-consuming and error-prone task. Automated preprocessing pipelines can facilitate the efficient and objective extraction of artifacts, enabling standardized and reproducible analyses. However, automated preprocessing pipelines typically remove data considered artifacts and return a subset of irreversibly transformed signals. This approach obfuscates preprocessing decisions and often makes it impossible to recover the original data or modify the preprocessing steps. Further, it complicates collaboration among research teams working on a common dataset, as different analyses may require specific preprocessing steps. Given the large amount of resources devoted to collecting EEG, tools that can efficiently and transparently preprocess data are greatly needed. PyLossless addresses this need by creating a non-destructive, automated preprocessing pipeline that maintains the continuous EEG structure. It offers a user-friendly API, is well documented, tested through continuous integration, easily deployable, and integrates with the popular MNE-Python environment. The pipeline also provides a browser-based quality control review (QCR) dashboard that allows researchers to visualize and edit automated artifact flags for sensors, time periods, and independent components. The end product of PyLossless is a lossless annotated data state that can be shared and used with analysis-specific artifact rejection policies, allowing for an optimal balance between flexibility and standardization.

Indexed as

ElectroencephalographySignal Processing, Computer-AssistedSoftwareArtifactsHumansArtifact rejectionElectroencephalographyNon-destructive processingPreprocessingReproducible analysis

Identifiers

PMID42410267
PMCPMC13337736

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.