Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42410228›Full record

ArticleJournal of religion and health2026

Enhancing the Focus of the Spiritual Involvement and Beliefs Scale-Introducing the SIBS-R2: Results from Canada and the USA.

John B Nezlek

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of religion and health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

John B NezlekCenter for Climate Action and Social Transformations (4CAST) Institute of Psychology, SWPS University, Warsaw, Poland. jbnezl@wm.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4963-3637

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Spiritual Involvement and Beliefs Scale-Revised (SIBS-R) is a popular measure of spirituality. Nevertheless, some items on the SIBS-R measure constructs other than spirituality (e.g., well-being), which undermines the validity of the SIBS-R as a measure of spirituality. In light of this, a new version of the SIBS-R, the SIBS-R2, was created. The SIBS-R2 consists of eight items from the SIBS-R that are not confounded with other constructs such as well-being. The SIBS-R2 was validated in two samples of university students, US (n = 153-433) and Canada (n = 214-273). Participants in these studies completed the SIBS-R, and they completed measures of religiosity (intrinsic, extrinsic, and religion as quest), personality (the Big Five and self-focused attention), and well-being (self-esteem, depression, and satisfaction with life). The SIBS-R2 was reliable in both samples (α = 0.92, US and 0.91, CA), and factor analyses found that the single-factor structures in the two samples were similar. Regression analyses found that the SIBS-R2 was positively related to intrinsic religiosity and was not significantly related to personal and social extrinsic religiosity nor to religion as quest. SIBS-R2 scores were positively correlated with satisfaction with life, self-esteem, agreeableness, conscientiousness, openness, and reflection, and was negatively correlated with rumination, although these relationships were not strong and varied slightly between the two samples. These results suggest that the SIBS-R2 is a measure of spirituality that is not meaningfully contaminated with personality, self-focused attention, and some aspects of well-being. Furthermore, a brief, three-item version of the SIBS-R2 was proposed.

Indexed as

PersonalityQuestionnaireReligiositySpiritualityWell-being

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.