ArticleNaunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology2026
Formulation, evaluation, and optimisation of soft chewable lozenges using Box-Behnken design for the treatment of schizophrenia.
Article in Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Schizophrenia is a long-term psychiatric disorder that generally requires long-term pharmacotherapy, where poor medication adherence and delayed therapeutic onset remain major challenges. The present study is focused on formulating, optimising, and evaluating soft chewable patient-friendly lozenges of brexpiprazole to improve dissolution, patient compliance, and drug absorption in individuals with schizophrenia. Soft chewable lozenges were prepared by a melt-pour method and optimised using a three-factor, three-level Box-Behnken design. PEG 1000, acacia, and colloidal silica were selected as formulation variables, while hardness and the time required for 80% drug release were considered as responses. The prepared formulations were subjected to physicochemical evaluation, dissolution testing, and stability assessment. All batches underwent physicochemical evaluation parameters, including in vitro dissolution and stability. The optimised formulation (S8) underwent in vivo pharmacokinetic evaluation on rabbits. Hardness values ranged between 2.2 and 5.6 kg/cm
Indexed as
Identifiers
42410223What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.