Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42410184›Full record

ArticleDysphagia2026

Oral Stimulation Interventions in Neonatal Feeding and Swallowing: A Bibliometric Mapping of Research Trends : Neonatal Oral Stimulation: A Bibliometric Analysis.

Hilal Berber Çiftci

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Dysphagia, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Hilal Berber ÇiftciDepartment of Speech and Language Therapy, Tarsus University, Mersin, Turkey. hilalberber1@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6577-837X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Oral stimulation techniques are frequently used in neonatal intensive care units to contribute to the development of oral feeding in newborns. Despite their widespread use in clinical practice, the conceptualisation and definition of these interventions vary considerably across the literature and interdisciplinary perspectives. This study aims to comprehensively map the scientific literature on oral stimulation in the neonatal population through bibliometric and scientific mapping. The publications to be analysed were identified in January 2026 using the advanced search interface of the Web of Science Core Collection (WoSCC). Following language and document type filtering (English; journal articles), the records were manually reviewed to ensure that oral stimulation was the primary focus of the publications. As a result of the review, 151 documents published between 1983 and 2026 were included in the analysis. VOSviewer was used for keyword co-occurrence networks, thematic clusters, and density visualisations, while the Biblioshiny package was used for descriptive bibliometric indicators. The analysed dataset identified 91 sources, 639 contributing authors and a total of 3,114 citations. The findings indicate that publication activity remained limited until the mid-2000s, with a marked increase occurring after 2013 and reaching its highest levels in recent years. The most frequently cited studies generally concern oral stimulation programmes, non-nutritive sucking behaviours, and combined sensorimotor intervention approaches designed to facilitate the transition from tube feeding to oral feeding. Concept mapping has shown that the literature maintains a consistent thematic core focusing on preterm infants, oral feeding, and non-nutritive sucking. However, studies in recent years have placed greater emphasis on structured intervention protocols and clinically meaningful feeding outcomes. The analyses generally provide a comprehensive overview of how the literature on oral stimulation in newborns has evolved over time. The results highlight the structural characteristics of the literature and shifting research priorities. Furthermore, these findings provide a useful framework for future research on neonatal feeding development and swallowing difficulties.

Indexed as

Bibliometric analysisNeonatal feedingNon-nutritive suckingOral stimulationOromotor stimulationPreterm infant

Identifiers

PMID42410184

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.