ArticleScientific reports2026
Co-ADAM: a co-evolutionary signaling game framework for equilibrium cyber deception in industrial IoT.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Cyber deception in Industrial Internet of Things (IIoT) environments faces a fundamental challenge, insufficient deception investment fails to trap attackers, while excessive deployment causes rational adversaries to accumulate skepticism, progressively neutralizing deceptive mechanisms. To the best of our knowledge, no existing reinforcement learning (RL) framework has jointly characterized the optimal deception investment level under these dynamics and trained against a co-evolutionary adversary that explicitly models skepticism accumulation. This paper introduces Co-ADAM, a Co-evolutionary Adaptive Deception-Aware Multi-mechanism defense framework that formalizes IIoT cyber deception as a constrained Markov decision process (CMDP) with an embedded signaling game. We establish that the co-evolutionary training will reach some equilibrium of skepticism (Lemma 1, Propositions 1, 2) and characterize the resulting joint policy as an ε-Nash deception equilibrium with exploitability ε = 2.4523 (4.43% normalized). A deep Q-network (DQN) defender is trained against an adaptive attacker pool of size K = 10 across 5000 episodes, with skepticism dynamics, attacker momentum, and budget constraints embedded directly in the environment. Compared to seven baselines over three IIoT datasets, CIC-IIoT 2025, WUSTL-IIoT 2021 and Edge-IIoTset, Co-ADAM attains an Attack Mitigation Rate (AMR) of 0.8363 under random and 0.8033 under adaptive attackers, with cumulative rewards of 147.91 and 102.52 respectively, all differences are statistically significant at p < 0.001. The learned policy transfers across heterogeneous IIoT environments with 99.61% mean AMR retention, scales to 1000 devices with less than 0.26% AMR degradation, and converges empirically at episode 1377. The most significant element of the architecture confirmed in ablation as adversarial skepticism (Cohen's d = 3.57), forms the foundation of principled skepticism modeling as a critical component of deception-based IIoT defense. Physical validation on a 10-day IIoT testbed comprising a Centerm D660 honeypot, three ESP32 sensors, and a Kali Linux attack machine confirms simulation findings with testbed AMR of 0.9975 exceeding simulation AMR of 0.8363.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.