ArticleScientific reports2026
Adversarial-resilient lightweight phishing url detection: Evaluating lexical & metadata features under evasion techniques.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Phishing is considered one of the most widespread and dynamic cyber threats, as attackers use deceitful URL structures to circumvent traditional detection tools. Despite promising performances of machine learning-based phishing detection techniques, the majority of existing models are evaluated under clean conditions, failing to account for adversarial URL evasion methods including obfuscation, encoding manipulation, homoglyph substitutions, token padding, and subdomain reordering. This weakness grossly compromises their practical performance in real-world deployments. Phishing URL detection is modelled as a lightweight binary classification problem supported by an explicit adversarial threat model. Lexical, structural, and metadata-based URL features are represented comprehensively without relying on raw URL strings or deep packet inspection (DPI), preserving user privacy and enabling broad deployment. To mitigate adversarial vulnerabilities, the Adversarial-Resilient Lightweight Random Forest (AR-LRF) model is proposed, combining controlled ensemble complexity with simulated adversarial perturbations applied during training. Extensive experiments on a large-scale imbalanced real-world dataset (91% benign, 9% phishing) consisting of 650,000 URLs were evaluated across accuracy, precision, recall, F1-score, and ROC-AUC under clean and adversarial conditions against five baseline classifiers: Logistic Regression, Decision Tree, Random Forest, Support Vector Machine, and Naïve Bayes. The AR-LRF achieves 99.78% accuracy and ROC-AUC of 0.9999 on clean data, with significantly lower performance degradation under adversarial perturbations. Feature importance and confidence stability analyses further validate the model's resilience, positioning AR-LRF as a viable, lightweight, and deployable tool for modern cybersecurity infrastructure.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.