Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42410077›Full record

ReviewNature human behaviour2026

Bridging the divide in motor learning research.

Eric Grießbach, Alfredo Hernandez-Inostroza, Rouwen Cañal-Bruland, Adrian M Haith

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Nature human behaviour, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Eric GrießbachDepartment of Neurology, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA. griessbach.eric@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2026-0523
Alfredo Hernandez-InostrozaCenter for Restorative Neurotechnology, Champalimaud Foundation, Lisbon, Portugal.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4708-3275
Rouwen Cañal-BrulandDepartment for the Psychology of Human Movement and Sport, Friedrich Schiller University Jena, Jena, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7731-0934
Adrian M HaithDepartment of Neurology, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5658-8654

Funding

Ministry of Education and Science | Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia (Portuguese Science and Technology Foundation) UID/04443/2025
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Motor learning underlies our ability to acquire and perfect movements across all domains of human behaviour. Its study encompasses two distinct but related endeavours: basic research on how we learn movement skills and applied research on how to enhance skill acquisition in real-world contexts. Despite their natural complementarity, these approaches developed historically in two largely independent communities with different disciplinary roots. One is closely associated with computational neuroscience and focuses predominantly on basic research. The other comes from experimental psychology and movement sciences with a stronger focus on applied research. The division between these communities is reflected in the experimental tasks they use, the theoretical frameworks they develop and the cultural norms that shape their training and communication. In this Perspective, we scrutinize this divide, review emerging efforts towards better integration and identify future opportunities. We contend that bridging these gaps can build a more comprehensive science of motor learning.

Indexed as

LearningMotor SkillsHumansNeurosciences

Identifiers

PMID42410077

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.