ArticleScientific reports2026
Implementation of an ai-enabled multimodal emergency care system is associated with improved sudden cardiac death rescue outcomes in anyang.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Sudden Cardiac Death (SCD) remains a leading cause of mortality worldwide, with outcomes critically dependent on the effective implementation of the "Chain of Survival" - early recognition, early CPR, early defibrillation, and post-resuscitation care. In regional and pre-hospital settings, systemic fragmentation between emergency dispatch, ambulance services, and hospitals undermines this chain. This study presents the development, implementation, and impact evaluation of an integrated, AI-enabled multi-modal emergency care system designed to strengthen the entire Chain of Survival for SCD in a regional context.: We designed and deployed a system integrating a unified information platform, IoT-enabled devices, point-of-care testing (POCT), and AI-driven clinical decision support. The system was implemented phased across three counties in Anyang, China (population ≈ 2.1 million) from January 2022 to December 2023. We conducted a quasi-experimental before-and-after study using routinely collected emergency medical services (EMS) data. Primary outcomes were median response time (call receipt to scene arrival), pre-hospital STEMI identification rate, and return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) of cardiac origin. Data from 1,208 emergency cases (pre-implementation: n = 587; post-implementation: n = 621) were analyzed. Interrupted time series (ITS) analysis was performed to control for secular trends. The median emergency response time decreased from 9.8 min (IQR: 7.2-13.1) to 6.7 min (IQR: 5.1-9.0) (P < 0.001). The pre-hospital STEMI identification rate improved from 65% to 90% (p < 0.01). For OHCA of cardiac origin, the ROSC rate increased from 18% to 31% (p < 0.05), representing a 72% relative improvement. ITS analysis confirmed a significant level change for response time (β = -2.8 min, 95% CI: -3.7 to -1.9, P < 0.001) and for ROSC (β = +12% points, 95% CI: +5 to + 19, P = 0.01) immediately following implementation, with no significant pre-existing trends. The AI models demonstrated robust performance during validation (deterioration prediction AUC 0.89; STEMI detection AUC 0.92). The Anyang Model provides evidence that a systematically integrated, AI-driven platform is feasible and temporally associated with substantial improvements in regional emergency care for SCD. While causal attribution requires further validation, this systems-level approach offers a replicable framework that can be adapted to diverse resource settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.