Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42409968›Full record

ArticleJournal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association2026

Language environments of infants in the NICU improve after a brief parent education intervention.

Rachel R Romeo, Nikita S Kalluri, Vanessa Young, Stephanie Heather Kinlay, Rylee Kerper, Anne R Hansen

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Rachel R RomeoDepartment of Human Development and Quantitative Methodology, University of Maryland, College Park, MD, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0315-4385
Nikita S KalluriDepartment of Pediatrics, UMass Chan Medical School, Worcester, MA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9275-2247
Vanessa YoungDivision of Newborn Medicine, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2258-4433
Stephanie Heather KinlayDivision of Newborn Medicine, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
Rylee KerperDivision of Newborn Medicine, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
Anne R HansenDivision of Newborn Medicine, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA. Anne.Hansen@childrens.harvard.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7766-5188

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Infants in neonatal intensive care units (NICUs) face high risk for language delays, compounded by limited parent-infant interaction. Although intensive parent programs are effective, it is unclear whether brief interventions can also promote positive outcomes. We developed a brief, 30-min language education for parents, and conducted a randomized controlled trial of 100 infants across two NICUs assigned to either receive the intervention or standard care. Parents who received the intervention showed significantly greater pre-to-post gains in knowledge of infant cognitive and language development, and their infants experienced larger increases in speech exposure during family visits. Moderations revealed that the intervention was especially effective for parents with lower education levels, and whose infants had complex medical needs. Findings indicate that a brief educational intervention can meaningfully enhance parental knowledge and infant language exposure in the NICU. Future work should assess whether this accessible approach may reduce disparities in long-term neurodevelopmental outcomes.

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.