ArticleScientific reports2026
Physics-informed deep learning-based adaptive beamforming for phased array weather radar.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study introduces a beamforming framework based on physics-informed deep-learning for phased array weather radar systems, with particular emphasis on configurations involving a large number of antenna elements. The proposed approach is designed to achieve both high computational efficiency and reliable weather target detection. Physical constraints governing array behavior are explicitly embedded into the learning process by means of a tailored loss function that minimizes the mismatch between the predicted array output and a predefined reference response. To assess the effectiveness of the physics-informed deep neural network (PIDNN) beamformer, its performance is evaluated against two classical neural network architectures commonly used in the computer science domain and also represent two different learning-based alternatives: a shallow radial basis function neural network (RBFNN) and a deeper convolutional neural network (CNN). Simulation results demonstrate that the PIDNN consistently outperforms these models in terms of beamforming accuracy and computational time. Furthermore, the practical applicability of the proposed method is verified using real-world measurements acquired from the phased array weather radar operated at Osaka University (PAR@OU). The experimental results confirm that the PIDNN enables rapid and accurate reflectivity estimation while exhibiting superior clutter suppression compared with the other methods.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.