ArticleScientific reports2026
Optimized image preprocessing strategies for enhanced neural network-based defect detection in industrial automation.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Machine vision and AI-based defect detection systems are increasingly deployed in manufacturing to support consistent product quality and high production efficiency. However, these automated inspection systems often suffer from sensitivity to imaging variability, dependence on large labeled datasets, and the need for manually engineered preprocessing pipelines-limitations that hinder accuracy and reliability in real industrial conditions. This study presents a novel approach for optimizing image preprocessing strategies for neural network-based defect detection using a genetic algorithm (GA)-driven evolutionary framework. The method systematically explores a set of 48 preprocessing operations and automatically evolves optimal filter sequences through multi-objective fitness evaluations incorporating classification accuracy, computational efficiency, and preprocessing robustness. The genetic algorithm generates diverse preprocessing sequences of varying lengths (3-6 filters) and evaluates a broad range of population sizes (20-100 individuals) and generation limits (20-150 generations) to identify configurations that maximize detection performance while reducing data requirements. Extensive experiments across three product categories show that GA-optimized preprocessing significantly outperforms raw-image baselines and manually designed preprocessing pipelines. Results demonstrate substantial gains in classification accuracy (up to 15%) and improved data efficiency, requiring 30-60% fewer training images to achieve target performance. The findings confirm that evolutionary optimization provides a robust and scalable solution for industrial defect detection, enabling more reliable and efficient machine vision systems for modern manufacturing environments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.