ArticleScientific reports2026
Joule-Heated direct writing: an electrically-driven additive manufacturing paradigm for space fabrication.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The imperative for in-space manufacturing drives the development of compact, energy-efficient metal additive manufacturing (AM) technologies. This work introduces and investigates a novel Joule-Heating Additive Manufacturing (JHAM) process, inspired by the Joule-Lenz effect, for the direct writing of metallic structures. A fully coupled thermal-electrical-structural finite element model is developed to simulate the multilayer deposition of 304 stainless steel wire, elucidating the unique "tusk-shaped" temperature field evolution and the effects of current, speed, and contact width. Single-bead, five-layer walls are fabricated experimentally, and the influence of process parameters on macrostructure, geometry (width, height, overlap rate), surface roughness (Ra, Rz), and cross-sectional hardness is systematically characterized. The results demonstrate that optimal macroscopic quality is achieved at 120 A, 200 mm/min, and a 1.0 mm contact width. The forming width and overlap rate increase with current, while the forming height decreases; conversely, increasing speed reduces width and overlap but increases height. Surface roughness and hardness exhibit non-monotonic trends with varying parameters, with a minimum Ra of 0.142 µm attained. Simulated and experimentally measured voltages show good agreement, validating the multiphysics model.Validation results indicate a voltage discrepancy of less than 10% between simulation and experiment. The JHAM process, with its low power consumption (<1 kW) and simplified architecture, presents a promising candidate for on-orbit fabrication of metallic components.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.