ArticleNature communications2026
Embodied cognition-driven interpretable trajectory prediction of autonomous systems.
Article in Nature communications, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
For autonomous systems to operate safely and reliably in dense traffic, they must perform trajectory prediction with human-like, interpretable reasoning. Prevailing data-driven "black-box" models fundamentally lack this capability. This research proposes a paradigm shift toward embodied intelligence, unifying cognitive science principles into a hierarchical framework: a Scene Attention Mechanism for threat prioritization, Social Impact Theory-driven graphs for intent inference, and a physics-compliant Social Force Model. Experimental results demonstrate that our framework reduces average displacement error by 42% and Final Displacement Error by 40% compared to existing state-of-the-art models on ETH and UCY, while enabling near-real-time inference (0.003 s). Crucially, the model's interpretable architecture, which is validated through risk-sensitive heatmaps and graph visualizations, reveals how agents dynamically balance safety, efficiency, and socio-cultural norms. Beyond performance gains, this work constructs an interpretable bridge between computational models and human cognitive science, laying a foundation for trustworthy autonomous systems.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.