Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42409787›Full record

ArticleNature communications2026

Evolutionary drivers of encephalization and facial reduction in the genus Homo.

Mark Hubbe, Katerina Harvati

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Mark HubbeUniversity of Tennessee - Knoxville, Department of Anthropology, Knoxville, USA.
Katerina HarvatiDFG Center for Advanced Studies 'Words, Bones, Genes, Tools: Tracking linguistic, cultural and biological trajectories of the human past', Eberhard Karls University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany. katerina.harvati@ifu.uni-tuebingen.de.ORCID 0000-0001-5998-4794

Funding

Carl Friedrich von Siemens Stiftung (Carl Friedrich von Siemens Foundation) Harvati Fellowship 2024-25Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (German Research Foundation) DFG FOR 2237Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (German Research Foundation) DFG HA 5258/19-1EC | EU Framework Programme for Research and Innovation H2020 | H2020 Priority Excellent Science | H2020 European Research Council (H2020 Excellent Science - European Research Council) ERC AdG 101019659National Science Foundation (NSF) NSF 2341331
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The evolution of cranial morphology in the genus Homo is marked by increasing encephalization and reduced facial robusticity through time. These changes are often assumed to be the product of directional natural selection for larger brain size, presumed to be associated with greater cognitive abilities, and for decreasing facial size to lower energetic costs, as masticatory demands were reduced through food processing and tool use. Here, we test this hypothesis by exploring the goodness-of-fit of the predictions of six evolutionary processes to the observed cranial morphological variation in Homo. We analyzed comprehensive neurocranial and facial 3D landmark coordinate datasets, grouped into eight Operational Taxonomic Units starting with early Homo and representing two lineages, Homo sapiens and Homo neanderthalensis. Our neurocranial analysis found strongest support for models of neutral evolution (Unbiased Random Walk) and stasis across both lineages. Similarly, the face shows strongest support for models of stasis, strict stasis, and neutral evolution (Unbiased Random Walk). Our findings suggest a limited role for gradual directional selection and underscore the importance of stabilizing selection and constraints in our lineage's evolution, highlighting the importance of environmental constraints and possibly cultural behaviors as core drivers of human evolution.

Indexed as

Biological EvolutionBrainFaceHominidaeSkullAnimalsFossilsHumansNeanderthalsPhylogenySelection, Genetic

Identifiers

PMID42409787
PMCPMC13338430

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.