SynthesisHuman vaccines & immunotherapeutics2026
The population impact of human papillomavirus vaccination on cancer and pre-cancer outcomes: An umbrella review of meta-analyses.
Synthesis in Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Despite widespread HPV vaccination, a comprehensive synthesis across populations and cancer outcomes is lacking. This umbrella review evaluates HPV vaccination's population impact on infection, precancerous lesions, and invasive cancers. We searched five databases for meta-analyses reporting prophylactic HPV vaccine outcomes up to Jan 2026. Two reviewers performed selection, data extraction, AMSTAR-2, and GRADE. From 34 meta-analyses, RCTs in HPV-naïve women showed 99% efficacy (95% CI: 98-99%) against HPV16/18 infection, 96% against CIN2+, and 89% against anogenital warts. Observational studies found relative risks of 0.12-0.36 (HPV16/18) and 0.48-0.68 (CIN2+). In men, effectiveness against warts was 74-90%. Ecological studies reported reductions in cervical cancer of 57-88%. GRADE certainty was high for infection/warts, moderate for precancer, and low for invasive cancer. HPV vaccination is highly effective. Invasive cancer prevention evidence is promising but emerging. Further research in immunocompromised populations is needed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.