ArticleThe Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience2026
Frontoparietal Hub Connectivity Integrates Information from Multiple Sources.
Article in The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Frontoparietal connector hubs are thought to support information integration across the brain, but this role has largely been inferred from static connectivity, leaving unclear how computational processes shape inter-regional connectivity during behavior. Here, we address this question using a model-based functional connectivity approach in human fMRI data. Thirty-eight participants (males and females) performed a task requiring the integration of sensory evidence with an internally maintained state belief to guide behavior. We developed a computational model that combines these information sources into an integrated representation and generates distinct variables at successive stages of integration: uncertainty before choice (entropy), the inferred task representation guiding action (task belief), and feedback (uncertainty-weighted error). We then tested how these variables modulate the connectivity of frontoparietal connector hubs. Entropy increased coupling between hubs and regions encoding task-relevant inputs and outputs during cue processing, suggesting enhanced communication under uncertainty. During task selection, task belief selectively modulated hub connectivity with motor regions according to the selected task. During feedback, uncertainty-weighted errors increased coupling with regions supporting task-relevant inputs and internal state, as well as task output (motor) regions, suggesting increased interactions with representations relevant for task performance following feedback. Together, our findings show that frontoparietal connector hubs implement integrative control by using an integrated representation to generate distinct computational signals that selectively and dynamically reconfigure inter-regional communication.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.