ArticleJournal of chemical theory and computation2026
Benchmark Study for Calculations of pKa Values of Metal Ligands in Proteins.
Article in Journal of chemical theory and computation, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
We have compared the performance of 64 different computational methods, based on combined quantum mechanical (QM) and molecular mechanical (QM/MM) or QM-cluster calculations in a continuum solvent, to estimate the acid constant (pKa) of metal-bound ligands in proteins. As a calibration set, we use 12 experimental pKa values from six different proteins that involve Zn2+, Fe3+, or Fe4+. We employ two different density functional theory (DFT) methods (TPSS and B3LYP), two basis sets (def2-SV(P) and def2-TZVPD), QM regions of three different sizes (∼40, ∼100, and ∼350 atoms), relaxed or fixed surroundings, and three different values of the dielectric constant of the continuum-solvation model (ε = 4, 20, or 80). The results clearly show that QM-cluster+continuum-solvation is much better than QM/MM. In general, the most accurate results are obtained with ε = 80 and the minimal QM region. The two DFT methods, the two basis sets, and relaxing or fixing the surroundings give similar results. The best-performing method is TPSS with the minimal QM region, def2-TZVPD, relaxed surroundings, and ε = 80, yielding a mean absolute deviation (after removal of a systematic error of 11.6 pKa units, pu) of 2.0 pu and a maximum deviation of 5.0 pu. The coefficient of determination (R2) and Kendall's τ with respect to the experimental pKa values are both 0.64, while Spearman's rank correlation coefficient is 0.78. This level of accuracy should be sufficient to reliably determine the protonation states of metal-bound ligands in QM-based studies of enzymatic reaction mechanisms.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.