ArticleBMJ open quality2026
Implementation of a brief intensive education programme in quality improvement.
Article in BMJ open quality, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Training in quality improvement (QI) and patient safety remains highly variable despite regulatory mandates. We describe a novel, intensive 5-day experiential QI education programme for postgraduate trainees that integrates real-world observation, brief didactic sessions and workshop-based improvement work, supplemented by creative storytelling and team-based development of campaign media products. First-year anaesthesia residents conducted over 100 structured operating room observations and interviews, collected quantitative and qualitative data on distractions and presented improvement proposals that they developed to institutional stakeholders along with narrative campaign videos. Postcourse evaluations demonstrated a significant increase in trainee confidence in QI methodology and presentation, with participants valuing the experiential and creative elements over traditional didactic instruction. This model demonstrates the feasibility, reproducibility and educational value of immersive, short-duration QI training in authentic clinical settings and suggests a promising alternative to longer, resource-intensive curricula.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.