Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42409328›Full record

ArticleApplied clinical informatics2026

Algorithmic Identification of the Daily Primary Frontline Clinician during Inpatient Medicine Encounters Using EHR Audit Log Data.

Laura R Baratta, Joanne Wang, Bailey W Osweiler, Daphne Lew, Elise Eiden, Thomas Kannampallil, Sunny S Lou

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Applied clinical informatics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Laura R BarattaWashington University School of Medicine in St. Louis, Missouri, United States, St. Louis.ORCID 0000-0001-8644-9033
Joanne WangWashington University School of Medicine in St. Louis, Missouri, United States, St. Louis.
Bailey W OsweilerWashington University in St. Louis, Department of Computational and Data Sciences, Missouri, United States, St. Louis.
Daphne LewInstitute for Informatics, Data Science, and Biostatistics, Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis, Missouri, United States, St. Louis.
Elise EidenWashington University School of Medicine in St. Louis, Department of Anesthesiology, Missouri, United States, St. Louis.
Thomas KannampallilInstitute for Informatics, Data Science, and Biostatistics, Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis, Missouri, United States, St. Louis.
Sunny S LouInstitute for Informatics, Data Science, and Biostatistics, Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis, Missouri, United States, St. Louis.ORCID 0000-0002-4215-605X

Funding

Intelligent Clinical Decision Support for Perioperative Blood ManagementK23HL166880 · NHLBI · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI Sunny S. Lou · 2024 to 2026
$521k
NHLBI NIH HHS K23 HL166880Washington University Internal Funds K23HL166880
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Interprofessional teams are central to high-quality patient care. However, identifying the daily frontline clinician who performs direct care-related tasks for a patient requires labor-intensive methodologies. Although electronic health record (EHR) audit logs offer a scalable alternative, their use for identifying frontline clinicians is underdeveloped. Objectives: This study aimed to develop and validate an algorithm utilizing EHR audit logs to identify the daily frontline clinician per patient-day of an inpatient medicine encounter. Methods: This was a cross-sectional cohort study of adult inpatient medicine encounters across 12 hospitals in one health system using a shared EHR. Admissions between February 1, 2023, and April 30, 2023, with a length of stay of at least 3 days and without an intensive care unit (ICU) admission were included. Four algorithm iterations were designed to identify the attending physician, resident, or advanced practice provider (APP) serving as the daily frontline clinician. The performance of each algorithm was compared with manual chart review on 1,401 patient-days from 246 randomly sampled patient encounters. Algorithm accuracy versus chart review was compared using McNemar's test with Bonferroni-adjusted Results: The best-performing algorithm correctly identified the daily frontline clinician on 91% of patient-days (1,268/1,401), outperforming algorithm 1, which selected the clinician who performed the most actions (78% accuracy, 1,098/1,401, Conclusion: We developed a scalable, audit log-based algorithm to determine the daily frontline clinician with high accuracy compared with manual chart review.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsElectronic Health RecordsInpatientsPhysiciansCross-Sectional StudiesHumans

Identifiers

PMID42409328
PMCPMC13337303

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.