ArticleClinical medicine (London, England)2026
Prognostic value of C-reactive protein to albumin ratio (CAR) for mortality in older adults with sepsis: Cohort study.
Article in Clinical medicine (London, England), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
STUDY
objectiveTo evaluate the prognostic value of the C-reactive protein/albumin (CAR) for mortality in older adults with sepsis. DESIGN AND
settingProspective observational cohort study conducted at General Hospital Zone No. 21, León, Guanajuato, Mexico (Nov 2023-Aug 2025).
participantsConsecutive patients aged >60 years with Sepsis-3-defined sepsis or septic shock, excluding those with prior ICU care, transfers, malignancies, cirrhosis, autoimmune disease, or non-septic shock.
interventionsNone. The CAR and Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) scores were measured at diagnosis and 72 h.
main outcome measures28-day all-cause mortality, with predictive performance assessed via area under the ROC curve (AUC).
resultsCAR was higher in septic shock versus sepsis. In patients with sepsis, both initial (AUC = 0.867) and 72-h (AUC = 0.852) ratios predicted mortality better than SOFA (AUC = 0.786). In septic shock, SOFA was superior (AUC = 0.785 vs. 0.637). An initial ratio in the highest tertile independently predicted mortality (HR 2.88, 95% CI 1.15-5.19, p < 0.001).
conclusionsThe CAR is a strong, independent mortality predictor in older adults with sepsis, outperforming SOFA in sepsis but not in septic shock. This simple biomarker can aid early identification of high-risk patients to guide timely intervention.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.