Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42406965›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2026

Turning policy implications into policy impact: Lessons from behavioral science in financial markets.

Alycia Chin, Katherine G Carman, Adam W Craig, Jonathan A Cook, David B Zimmerman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Science in service: Behavioral research applications across federal agencies.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Alycia ChinU.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, Office of the Investor Advocate, Washington, DC 20549.ORCID 0000-0002-9570-0549
Katherine G CarmanU.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, Office of the Investor Advocate, Washington, DC 20549.ORCID 0000-0002-5760-4441
Adam W CraigUniversity of Kentucky, Gatton College of Business and Economics, Lexington, KY 40506.ORCID 0000-0002-9021-1981
Jonathan A CookU.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, Office of the Investor Advocate, Washington, DC 20549.
David B ZimmermanU.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, Office of the Investor Advocate, Washington, DC 20549.ORCID 0000-0001-5784-2733

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We describe how research can inform policymaking. We begin by summarizing the policy formation process, offering a framework illustrating how interactions between scientists and policymakers can provide mutual benefits. We then describe four research initiatives from the Securities and Exchange Commission's Office of Investor Research (OIR) as examples of how behavioral sciences can help inform policymakers. The first initiative established a probability-based nationally representative survey panel focused on US investor behavior. The remaining three examined investor communications for mutual fund benchmarks, emerging annuities (known as registered index-linked annuities), and mutual fund fee visuals. We conclude by synthesizing our work and describing practices that can help scientists have policy impact, not just policy implications.

Indexed as

evidence-informed policyinformation disclosureinvestor behaviornationally representative panelpolicy formation

Identifiers

PMID42406965
PMCPMC13367800

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.