ArticleJMIR cancer2026
Real-World Impact of Electronic Patient-Reported Outcomes on Early Intervention Among Older Patients With Lung Cancer: Prospective Cohort Study.
Article in JMIR cancer, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Electronic patient-reported outcomes (ePROs) have demonstrated greater sensitivity in detecting adverse events than clinician-reported outcomes. However, conventional care faces challenges related to recall bias, and evidence from real-world populations of older adults is limited. This study evaluates the feasibility of an ePRO system integrated with ecological momentary assessment and ecological momentary intervention (EMI) to facilitate a concordance model within the framework of digital transformation in health care. Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the satisfaction, usability, and clinical impact of an ePRO system integrated with ecological momentary assessment and EMI in a real-world cohort of older patients with lung cancer and to investigate its ability to facilitate a patient-centered concordance model within the framework of digital transformation in health care. Methods: In this single-center prospective cohort study, 35 patients with lung cancer used the Welby My Carte ONC app to record daily symptoms and visual data. Satisfaction and usability were evaluated using 10-point scales at the end of the first and third treatment cycles. The study focused on the clinical impact of EMI triggered by ePRO data, such as early detection of toxicity. Results: The cohort included a high proportion of older patients (20/35, 57%) aged 70 to 89 years. Satisfaction and usability scores significantly improved over time (satisfaction: 6.0 to 8.0, P<.001; usability: 5.0 to 8.0, P<.001). ePRO monitoring enabled the early detection of critical events, including immune-related uveitis (case 1), Stevens-Johnson syndrome (case 2), rare drug-induced purpura (case 3), and the monitoring of infusion-related reactions (case 4). Conclusions: ePRO monitoring is feasible for older patients with lung cancer and enhances safety through timely EMI. It serves as a core component of a comprehensive patient support program and supports the transition to a more active concordance model, ultimately improving patient well-being.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.