ArticleEpidemiology (Cambridge, Mass.)2026
Temporal Connectivity of Social Contact Networks in Urban and Rural India.
Article in Epidemiology (Cambridge, Mass.), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe epidemic potential of infectious diseases depends on how contacts connect individuals over time-a form of temporal connectivity that has rarely been quantified in resource-poor settings. We used the forward-reachable path (FRP)-the proportion of population reachable from an index person via direct or indirect connections-to quantify temporal connectivity in contact networks relevant for acute respiratory transmission.
methodsFrom empirical social-contact data collected in rural and urban Tamil Nadu, India, we derived contact-location-specific network statistics. These statistics were used to parameterize dynamic network models, simulate daily networks over 1 year, and compute FRPs.
resultsIn both rural and urban networks, mean FRPs rose sharply on day 1, then either increased steadily at school and work or plateaued at home and at locations included in the other layer (that is, locations other than home, school, and work). By day 365, mean FRPs followed the order: home (0.06% [rural] and 0.03% [urban]) < school (11.96% [rural] and 9.14% [urban]) < work (12.55% [rural] and 26.72% [urban]) < other (40.54% [rural] and 67.99% [urban]). The mean FRP peaked at home among those aged ≥60 years, at school among those aged 10-19 years, and at work among those aged 40-59 years.
conclusionsAlthough FRP at home was bounded by household size, reachability expanded substantially through school, work, and other contacts. These findings indicate high temporal connectivity and substantial epidemic potential for acute respiratory transmission in these settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.